# Weekly Forecast, September 23, 2022: Peak 1-Month Treasury Forward Rates Drop 0.21%

The 75 basis point increase in the Federal Reserve led to a twist in the yield curve, with short-term Treasury yields rising and long-term Treasury yields falling. The 1-month US Treasury forecast yield now peaks at 4.68%, down 21 basis points of last week.

As explained in Professor Robert Jarrow’s book cited below, forward rates contain a risk premium above market expectations for the 1-month forward rate. We document the size of this risk premium in this chart, which shows the zero-coupon yield curve implied by current Treasury prices versus the annualized compound return on 3-month Treasury bills that market participants would expect in based on the daily movement of Treasury yields. since 1962. The risk premium, the reward for a long-term investment, is significant for the entire maturity range up to 30 years. The chart also shows that historical movements in Treasuries imply a steady decline in 3-month rates after an initial peak.

For more on this topic, see the analysis of US Treasury yields through March 31, 2022 given in the appendix.

**Inverted yields, negative rates and** **10-year US Treasury probabilities**

The negative 2-year/10-year Treasury spread has persisted for 58 trading days, widening again this week to negative 51 basis points from negative 45 basis points last week. In this week’s forecast, the focus is on three elements of interest rate behavior: the future probability of the inverted yield curve predicting recession, the probability of negative rates, and the probability distribution of Treasury yields. American over the next decade.

We start from the US Treasury rate closing curve and interest rate swap quotes based on the overnight guaranteed funding rate published daily by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Using a maximum smoothing forward rate approach, Friday’s implied forward rate curve shows a rapid rise in 1-month rates to an initial high of 4.50% from 4.36% last week. After the initial rise, there is some volatility before rates peak again at 4.24% from 3.72% a week ago. Rates eventually peak again at 4.68%, from 4.89% last week, then decline to plateau below at the end of the 30-year horizon.

Using the methodology described in the appendix, we simulate 500,000 future paths for the 30-year US Treasury yield curve. The following three sections summarize our conclusions from this simulation.

**Treasury Yield Inverted: Inverted now, 94.2% probability by March 24, 2023**

Many economists have concluded that a downward sloping US Treasury yield curve is an important indicator of future recessions. A recent example is this article by Alex Domash and Lawrence H. Summers. We measure the probability that the 10-year nominal coupon Treasury yield will be lower than the 2-year nominal coupon Treasury yield for each scenario in each of the first 80 quarterly periods of the simulation.^{ 1}

The following chart shows that the probability of an inverted return remains elevated, peaking at 94.2%, from 85.9% a week earlier, during the 91-day quarterly period ending March 24, 2023.

**Negative treasury yields: 7.6% probability by June 18, 2027**

The following graph depicts the probability of negative 3-month Treasury bill rates for all the last 3 months of the next 3 decades. The probability of negative rates starts near zero but then increases steadily to peak at 7.6%, up from 7.8% a week earlier, in the period ending June 18, 2027:

**10-year US Treasury probabilities**

In this section, the focus is on the coming decade. This week’s simulation shows that the most likely range for the yield on 3-month US Treasuries ten years from now is 0% to 1%. There is a 27.59% chance that the 3-month yield will fall within this range, a change from 27.47% a week earlier. For the 10-year Treasury yield, the most likely range is 2% to 3%. The probability of being in this range is 24.06%, compared to 23.40% a week earlier.

In a recent article on Seeking Alpha, we pointed out that a “heads” or “heads” prediction in a draw misses critical information. What a knowledgeable bettor should know is that on average, for a fair coin, the probability of heads is 50%. A prediction that the next coin toss will be heads is literally worthless to investors because the outcome is purely random.

The same is true for interest rates.

In this section, we present the detailed probability distribution for the 3-month Treasury bill rate and the 10-year US 10-year Treasury bill yield using semi-annual time steps. We present the probability of where rates will be at each time step in 1% “rate buckets”. The forecasts are presented in this graph:

**US 3-Month Treasury Yield Data:**

SAS3monthUST20220923.xlsx

The probability that the yield on 3-month Treasury bills will be between 1% and 2% in 2 years is shown in column 4: 21.63%. The probability that the 3-month Treasury yield will be negative (as has often been the case in Europe and Japan) in 2 years is 0.40% plus 0.00% plus 0.00% = 0, 40%. Cells shaded blue represent positive probabilities of occurrence, but the probability has been rounded to the nearest 0.01%. The shading scheme works like this:

Dark blue: the probability is greater than 0% but less than 1%

Light blue: the probability is greater than or equal to 1% and less than 5%

Light yellow: the probability is greater than or equal to 5% and 10%

Medium yellow: the probability is greater than or equal to 10% and less than 20%

Orange: the probability is greater than or equal to 20% and less than 25%

Red: the probability is greater than 25%

The chart below shows the same probabilities for the 10-year US Treasury yield derived under the same simulation.

**US 10-Year Treasury Yield Data:**

SAS10yearUST20220923.xlsx

**Annex: Cash simulation methodology**

Probabilities are derived using the same methodology that SAS Institute Inc. recommends to its KRIS® and Kamakura Risk Manager® clients, who currently have over $38 trillion in assets or assets under management. A moderately technical explanation is given later in the appendix, but we summarize it first in plain language.

Step 1: We take as a starting point the US Treasury closing rate curve.

Step 2: We use the number of points on the yield curve that best explain historical shifts in the yield curve. Using daily data from 1962 through June 30, 2022, we conclude that 10 “factors” determine almost all movements in US Treasury yields.

Step 3: We measure the volatility of changes in these factors and its evolution over the same period.

Step 4: Using these measured volatilities, we generate 500,000 random shocks at each time step and derive the resulting yield curve.

Step 5: We “validate” the model to ensure that the simulation EXACTLY assesses the starting Treasury curve and that it matches the story as closely as possible. The methodology for doing this is described below.

Step 6: We take the 500,000 simulated yield curves and calculate the probabilities of yields falling in each of the 1% “buckets” shown in the chart.

**Do Treasury yields accurately reflect expected future inflation?**

We showed in a recent article on Seeking Alpha that, on average, investors have almost always done better buying long-term bonds than rolling over short-term Treasuries. This means that market participants have generally (but not always) been accurate in their forecasts of future inflation and in adding a risk premium to those forecasts.

The above distribution helps investors estimate the probability of a successful long position.

Finally, as mentioned each week in The Corporate Bond Investor Friday preview, the future expenses (both amount and timing) that all investors try to cover with their investments are an important part of the investment strategy. . The author follows his own advice: cover short-term cash needs first, then cover more distant cash needs as savings and investment returns accumulate.

**Technical details**

Daily treasury bill returns are the basic historical data for adjusting the number of yield curve factors and their volatility. Historical data is provided by the US Treasury Department.

An example of the modeling process using data up to March 31, 2022 is available at this link.

The modeling process was published in a very important article by David Heath, Robert Jarrow and Andrew Morton in 1992:

For technically inclined readers, we recommend Professor Jarrow’s book *Modeling fixed income securities and interest rate options* for those who want to know exactly how the construction of the “HJM” model works.

The number of factors (10 for the United States) has been stable for some time.

**Footnotes :**

- After the first 20 years of the simulation, the 10-year Treasury bills cannot be derived from the yields of the first 30-year Treasury bills.

Comments are closed.